 |
“Greening of Policies – Interlinkages and Policy
Integration”
2004 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global
Environmental Change
Berlin, 3-4 December 2004
Deadline for submissions: 15 August 2004
Download (PDF)
The Environmental Policy and Global
Change section of the German Political Science Association (DVPW)
and its partners invite papers for the 2004 Berlin Conference on the
Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, to be held in
Berlin on 3-4 December 2004. This year’s discussions will address
the theme “Greening of Policies – Interlinkages and Policy
Integration”. The 2004 Berlin Conference has been endorsed by the
International Human Dimensions Programme (IHDP) core projects
“Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change (IDGEC)”
and “Industrial Transformation” (IHDP-IT), and is organised by the
Environmental Policy Research Centre of the Freie Universität
Berlin. Additional support is provided by the Global Governance
Project (glogov.org).
The Policy Problem
Problems of Global and Regional
Environmental Change are by their very nature sector-related
problems. Insofar, their solution requires sector-integrated
approaches of policy-making that abandon the parallel pursuit of
contradictory policies. Thirty years of environmental policy-making
at the national and international level reveal, however, striking
problems to establish interlinkages that lead to an integration of
regimes and joined-up policy-making, both horizontally on each level
of political decision-making and vertically between the different
layers of the multi-level system of international governance. At the
national level, new cross-cutting issues such as environmental
protection have been institutionalized mostly in a separate way,
without changing the framework conditions for action in the policy
sectors mainly responsible for environmental deterioration. Also,
new international environmental agreements have been
institutionalized separately from other policy regimes.
One crucial factor in explaining this path of development is the
traditional organization model of bureaucracy that is based upon
specialization and division of work. It has proven to be successful
in a number of ways. It fails, however, in addressing the needs of
cross-cutting problems such as environmental protection. The
challenge, both at the national and international level, is to
establish institutional provisions that allow actors to pursue a
more coordinated approach. Special attention has to be paid to
mutual interaction between regimes and policies on the international
and national level, such as trade and environment.
The struggle for coherence and policy integration is going into its
fourth decade. Meanwhile, the overall framework conditions of
policy-making have considerably changed: Processes of economic and
political globalization have deepened, new forms of governance have
emerged and new actors have entered the stage, such as International
Organizations or transnational advocacy-networks. The result is a
significant increase of the complexity of policy-making.
What is needed is a comprehensive
review of the gathered experiences, in order to learn, which
strategies might be applied best at which level against the
background of this increased complexity of policy-making. The
analysis of past experiences requires a joint effort of different
disciplines. In particular political scientist and lawyers can
improve the understanding of institutions for policy integration. It
is furthermore necessary to assess the impacts of policies on the
different dimensions of sustainability to inform policy makers about
integration requirements and hence form the knowledge basis of
policy coherence and integration. Different tasks might be best
suited at different levels, but the concrete allocation of
competencies and responsibilities is a question open to discussion.
This requires a close co-operation of many different disciplines.
Possible foci of such efforts are integrated models and integrated
assessments. The conference should bring about a stocktaking of both
the institutional basis of policy integration on the different
levels of policy making as well as an improvement of the knowledge
basis for a furthering of integration.
Core Questions
Given the obstacles for a more far
reaching consideration of environmental concerns in sectoral policy
making processes on both the national and the international level
there is a need for an analysis of instruments and strategies, and
the institutional setting in which they are implemented. Which
approaches have proven to be successful, what are the impediments?
Against this background contributions are particularly invited on
the following issues:
- Analysis of policy integration
in practice: What kinds of institutions are successful in
strengthening policy integration? Which actors, which instruments
and strategies were the driving forces of a greening of policies?
We are interested in case studies from different policy fields and
from different levels of policy making. What are the implications
of policy integration for environmental policy? Is there evidence
for a diluting of environmental concerns by building up an
over-complexity of integration requirements and a loss of
advantages gained by specialization? What is the role of law in
codifying integration requirements? In how far are major trends,
e.g. economic and political globalization, from government to
governance, from environmental protection to sustainable
development affecting integration efforts?
- Instruments and knowledge basis
for policy integration: What methods are available or currently
under development that allow for an ex ante evaluation of the
effects of policies on the different dimensions of sustainability?
What indicators are available that allow an assessment in how far
a policies are integrated? What experiences are available in
integrating the different domains of knowledge for such an
assessment?
- Multi-level aspects: To what
extent are international regimes affecting the capacities at the
national level for a greening of policies and vice versa? What
efforts have been undertaken to ensure also a vertical integration
among the different levels of policy making? In how far are
impacts in other countries considered in approaches of policy
integration, in particular in respect of developing countries?
What mechanisms proved to be successful in ensuring the coherence
of the different international regimes, in particular between
environmental and trade regimes?
Plenary speakers include
Special panel Teaching
This years Berlin Conference will
host a special panel on academic environmental teaching programs.
Complex environmental problems as climate change, loss in
biodiversity, ground water pollution, degradation of soil caused by
human activities ranging from global to local level challenge
academia in many respects.
To tackle these problems
contributions from a variety of natural and social science
disciplines are needed. Topics such as the deterioration of the
earth system, institutional measures for the greening of policies,
policy impact assessment, strategic approaches to multi-level
environmental governance require an interdisciplinary perspective.
Hence academic training has to
adapt new forms of systematic interdisciplinary cooperation.
Professional training needs to integrate elements such as
interdisciplinary communication, methods of problem-oriented
approaches and teambuilding. Moreover the ground has to be paved for
communication between academia and non-university experts and
practitioners from the state, industry and non-government
organisations.
How can academic programs respond to these challenges? We invite
papers to exchange experiences in teaching environmental sciences,
dealing with questions such as:
How can curriculum design of
Bachelors and Masters level environmental teaching programs respond
to the challenges of inter- to transdisciplinary sciences? How can
interlinkages between research and teaching be created most suitable?
What can be learned from pioneering interdisciplinary projects in
terms of institutional design for inter-faculty cooperation bridging
the gaps between the disciplines? How can communication beyond
academia be improved? What kind of problem-solving skills are
required from the perspective of both public and private
organisations involved in environmental governance? How can the
international cooperation of academic environmental science programs
be advanced also in regard to capacity building for environmental
academic education?
How to participate
The 2004 Berlin Conference on the
Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change is the fourth of its
kind in Germany. The last meetings, gathered around 200 participants
from all over the world each for intensive two-day debates. While
the Berlin Conferences have so far been organised by the German
Political Science Association, we also seek dialogue with colleagues
from economics and other fields of the social sciences. Furthermore,
we welcome representatives of natural and integrative sciences. The
conference will be held in English. Prospective paper-givers should
send an abstract of their paper that outlines the main argument,
method and finding of the research to the conference office (BC2004@zedat.fu-berlin.de).
The submission must include name, affiliation and address of the
author(s) and must not exceed 300 words.
Deadline
The deadline for submissions is August 15th, 2004. All paper and
panel submissions will be reviewed before being accepted for the
conference programme. We will send out decisions on acceptance of
papers by September 15th, 2004. We expect all presenters to e-mail
the final version of their paper by November 15th. Full papers
submitted earlier will be posted on our web site to initiate early
discussion.
Financial Support
We are making all efforts to ensure funding to reimburse the travel
costs of some paper presenters. For earlier conferences, generous
donor support allowed us to reimburse parts of the travel costs of
many non-German participants, with special consideration of
participants from developing countries and countries with economies
in transition and of more junior colleagues.
Further Information
Further Information
For questions or suggestions, please
contact
|
 |