Date sent: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 16:09:04 +0000
From: Sandi Harris & Stephen Barber
Organization: Lutemakers
To: DrVladimirIvanoff@compuserve.com, lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: The lute in Holbein's "Ambassadors" (long)
Dear Dr. Ivanoff, dear lutenetters,
the lute in the Hans Holbein painting The Ambassadors of 1533 has long
been the subject of fascination, speculation and intrigue to modern
lutemakers, and now that the cleaned and restored painting is once again
on show in the National Gallery, it is possible to study closely both
the instrument and its accompanying case in considerable detail. The
painting - executed on 10 vertically-joined fine-grained oak panels - is
now visible behind glass, although the exhibition of 1997-98 at the
National Gallery afforded a unique and unprecedented opportunity to
closely examine its details, for those fortunate to be able to visit it.
For most of the 20th Century, the painting was obscured by
over-varnishing, to which had adhered accumulated grime and muck; the
recent restoration, whilst causing controversy and raging debate in the
conservation and art history world, has nevertheless allowed us an
unobstructed view of the surface of the painting, and to properly
consider, evaluate and attempt historical attributution of the objects
depicted - many of which were effectively obscured from study by experts
and other interested parties - in probably as close to its original
state as current techniques and research allow. The restoration team
assure us that the colours we see now are pretty much as Holbein's
brushes drew them.
A highly-recommended book, "Making and Meaning - Holbein's Ambassadors"
by Susan Foister, Ashok Roy and Martin Wyld, published by National
Gallery Publications (and distributed by Yale University Press) and
available from the Gallery and other outlets, describes the painting and
its restoration in considerable detail, for those interested in this
superb and important work.
Its ISBN number is: 1-85709-173-6.
The lute itself, seen in foreshortening and viewed from the pegbox end,
is laying on its back on the lower of two shelves, in the lower centre
of the painting, soundboard uppermost. It is a 6-course instrument
which, judging from the size of the two figures and the other objects,
would appear to be about the size of a g' or f'-sharp lute of, say,
between 590-640mm. It is, of course, impossible to be precise about
this, since the exact height of the two men - Georges de Selve (bishop
of Lavaur) and Jean de Dinteville (French ambassador to the court of
Henry VIII) is not known.. It is set up with 11 pegs, with the first
course single, and the lower courses 4-6 clearly with octave stringing
(the octave string of the 4th course is broken, and lies undulating
across the belly).
It is very blond (maple ?) in appearance, its 13-rib back appears to be
from a wood of similar grain to birds-eye maple, probably lightly
varnished or oiled; the colouring of the neck, fingerboard, pegbox, nut
and back are very close in hue and tone, although the back is a little
lighter. The neck, which has a deep, 'parabola' section similar to that
found on the only two surviving six-course lutes with their original
necks intact (by Georg Gerle of Innsbruck and Magno dieffopruchar of
Venice respectively, both working later in the 16th Century than the
1533 date of the painting) seems to be constructed in one piece with the
fingerboard. The shape of the pegs is very interesting, in that it
recalls the hilt design of what are usually referred to as "bollock
daggers" (in armour collections such as the Tower of London and Schloss
Ambras, Innsbruck, for example). Unfortunately for the modern lutemaker,
the rose design is not fully recognisable, although it appears to be a
version of the 'Tieffenbrucker knot', and the bridge design is similarly
not easy to be absolutely sure about. The deep fluting of the ribs - an
effect caused by the shrinkage of parchment over a (relatively-short)
period of time is very accurately rendered, with the outer rib (bass
side only visible) wider than the inner ones, as one would expect. There
are 8 tied frets, relatively thin, in what appears to be a double-fret
arrangement (ie each fret passes twice around the neck) and no
soundboard frets on what looks like a very clean belly. The pegbox, of a
very practical design, is provided with plenty of room to tie the
strings; Stephen drew this design on the 6-course lute drawn for the
Lute Society in 1982 as a possible pegbox design.
The strings are also tantalising, in that they actually look like they
were supplied by a modern string-maker ! They certainly look more like
the diamaters of Kurschner, Pyramid or Savarez overspun strings on the
basses of courses 4-6, rather than the thick roped basses which most
modern gut-string makers offer (with the exception of so-called
'loaded' strings) and without stepping into the debate over exactly what
these strings were, this painting is certainly food for thought, and
casts doubt on the experiments on making 'roped' and 'catline' basses
conducted in the early part of the modern lute-revival.
Although the lute has always been prominently visible in the painting,
the case, on the other hand, has been largely obscured until the recent
cleaning; it was always known that the case was there (laying face-down,
closed, under and behind the table, and obscured by one of its legs and
Jean de Dinteville's left leg) and it seemed to be similar to other
lute-cases seen in contemporary paintings, but the cleaning has revealed
more information.
The case, of compact design, has a ribbed-construction, and appears to
be either covered by some black material or painted black; it is hinged
at slightly lower than the widest point, across the body (these cases
generally were hinged at the widest point or just below). The lid seems
to slightly overlap the body of the case - perhaps an attempt at
introducing some weatherproofing into its design.
This design of lute case continued well into the 18th Century, and we
were fortunate to be able to examine and conserve an actual example a
few years ago; it was a theorbo case, made of limewood and pine, painted
black, and lined inside with combed, marbled papers of marvellous
colours and hues; a friend who is a paper conservator (and works at the
National Gallery) actually had samples of the same papers, which dated
from c.1760, so we were able to use a little piece in the conservation
of the case. The case and instrument - a Magno dieffopruchar - were from
a private collection in Italy.
A sobering thought for modern players, and pertinent to the recent
postings on lute-cases, is that this case had no soft linings, was quite
heavy, and did not seem to us to have been particularly strong, although
well and neatly-constructed.
Many of the objects depicted in The Ambassadors have apparently
survived, or virtually identical examples have (celestial globe,
quadrant, torquetum, dividers, set-square and other scientific
instruments) and some have in the past been rumoured to be in private or
Royal collections, although so far no convincing Holbein lute has
surfaced.
As far as finding a surviving example of a Holbein-like lute among the
various 16th Century lutes in museums and private collections today,
there is nothing which survives with a neck, pegbox, pegs and
fingerboard like this one - the Gerle and deiffopruchar lutes referred
to above have their necks veneered with ivory. Until somebody is able to
produce a convincing computer-generated rationalised outline of it from
the painting (we asked the National Gallery years ago, they declined -
any offers, anybody ?) we will not be sure about the actual plantila
shape of the soundboard outline, although it seems to be a 'rounded'
Gerle-like shape rather than an elongated 'pearl' shape like a Frei or
Maler. The beautifully painted neck and pegbox details allow the modern
lutemaker to work closely from them when building 'plain' 6-course
lutes, although most modern pegmakers have baulked at the idea of
carving the "bollock-pegs".
In the collection of the Vienna Kunsthistorisches Museum (C.29, formerly
C.33) there is a lute bearing a Hans Frei label, which we have closely
examined and photographed, which appears to be made from a very similar
wood to that used for the back of the Holbein lute, but with 9 ribs, not
13; this wood is probably birds-eye maple, which is just about possible
for Frei's probable dates, since it is a timber which does not occur in
Europe, and was always imported from the eastern seaboard of North
America. This Frei is the earliest known example we are aware of which
uses this wood, although of course, since even Frei's dates have never
been conclusively proven, its exact provenance must be approached with
caution.
There is, however, an example of a timber which is definitely European
in origin, used as the keys for a regal (organ) in private hands in the
UK, which displays a birds-eye like grain in a timber which has been
identified as a maple species. However, it looks 'warty' rather than
displaying the 'eye' formation seen in true birds-eye; these 'warts' are
harder than the surrounding timber, and stand above it after long
playing. The instrument is dated to the mid-15th Century, so the timber
is probably of European origin (or central Asian) and being
pre-Columbian, cannot be from North America.
The general appearance of the grain of this keyboard resembles closely
what Holbein has painted as the back of the lute in The Ambassadors; we
have encountered this timber rarely over the last 25 years, and it seems
to occur occasionally in hedgerow maples, growing under difficult
conditions, and not evenly distributed throughout the timber, as is the
case with 'Hungarian' ash.
So, has Holbein painted a timber that is tantalisingly-rare and
virtually unobtainable today ? Does the lute itself exist somewhere ?
It is certainly one of the most beautifully-drawn, accurately-observed
paintings of a 6-course lute that we have to refer to, and exactly what
one would expect to see on a 'plain' instrument, following the evidence
of the ivory Gerle and dieffopruchar; and everything, including strings,
in all probability was painted by Hans Holbein exactly as he saw them -
after all, the other objects in the painting are perfectly represented,
why not the lute and its fittings ?
This question about Holbein's lute has arisen at an interesting time for
us, since we have been working on drawings for a realisation of this
lute over the winter, and have just looked again at the Vienna Frei C29.
We hope that this goes some way to answering the questions about the
lute and its case.
Best Wishes, Stephen Barber & Sandi Harris, lutemakers.
http://www.LutesAndGuitars.co.uk