studyguide:corpuslinguistic-research-paper [Linguistics Resources]

This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong.
====== Corpus-linguistic research papers ======

Term papers in corpus linguistic seminars should follow the **IMRaD** structure, consisting of four sections: **I**ntroduction, **M**ethods, **R**esults, and **D**iscussion. This is a standard structure of scientific papers, we have adapted it specifically to corpus linguistic research papers below. A more detailed overview of the core parts of a corpus-linguistic research paper can be found [[studyguide:research-report|here]].

The **introduction** should simply be titled //Introduction//. It **must** answer the following questions:
  * What is the topic of the study, What is the linguistic phenomenon under investigation (give an example!). What aspect of the phenomenon is under investigation, what factors are expected to play a role in the description and explanation?
  * What is the specific research question or hypothesis?
  * What is the current state of knowledge about the phenomenon in the field? Are there current publications that deal with the same question, how is the phenomenon described in current reference works (grammars, dictionaries), if at all?
In addition, it **may** answer the following questions:
  * What is the broader purpose of the study?
  * Why (or for whom) is this research question relevant?

The **methods** section can simply be titled //Methods//, but depending on the focus that you give different aspects of the research design, it can also be titled //Methods and Materials//, //Methods and Data//, //Data Extraction and Annotation// or something similar. It **must** answer the following questions:
  * What corpus or corpora were selected for the study and why?
  * How were the data extracted? What query was used? Were the data checked manually? Were specific cases excluded individually? Did you include the entire data set in your analysis or did you draw a random sample?
  * How were the data categorized? What categories did you use and why? How did you assign data to your categories (annotation)?

The **results** section should simply be titled //Results//. It **must** contain a compact presentation of your data (in the form of tables and/or diagrams) that answer the following questions:
  * What is the answer to your research question?
  * Is your hypothesis supported by your results, or is it falsified?
  * In addition, it may contain a brief assessment of the quality of your data, for example, if the data do not provide a clear or complete answer.

The **discussion** section can simply be titled //Discussion//, but depending on your focus you can also use combinations of the words //Summary//, //Conclusion//, and //Outlook// (if you have a long discussion section, you can use these as subheadings). The section **must** answer the following questions:
  * How can your study be summarized, i.e., what was your research question and what is the answer (someone reading only the discussion section should be able to have a rough idea of your study).
  * How does this relate to the current state of knowledge in the field? Does your result confirm what others have found? Have you added new insights?
In addition, it **may** contain answers to the following questions:
  * What follows from the answer? How  is it relevant in terms of theory or application?
  * What are the limits of your study? How could it be expanded in future research?