This is a copy of an extended abstract, ISAG (International Symposium on Andean Geodynamics) meeting in Barcelona, Catalunya, Sept. 2005. A newer article is:
The mantle wedge in the Bolivian orocline in the view of deep electromagnetic soundings
Heinrich Brasse, Fachrichtung Geophysik, FU Berlin, Malteserstr. 74-100, D-12249 Berlin, Germany
KEY WORDS: electrical conductivity, magnetotellurics, mantle wedge, central Andes
Motivated
by earlier findings of a large zone of high electrical conductivity below the
southern Altiplano (Ancorp profile, cf. Brasse et al. 2002) a comparative
magnetotelluric (MT) study was performed in 2002 (continued in 2004) along a
profile extending from the Eastern Cordillera over the central Altiplano and
the Western Cordillera until the forearc in North Chile (Fig. 1). Spacing
between stations was on the average 10 km and data were recorded in a
period range from 10-20.000 s, yielding approximate penetration depths
from 5-200 km, depending on subsoil conductivity. The profile direction
is approx. 45° and thus roughly perpendicular to the strike of main structural
features in this area of the Bolivian orocline as well as to the contour lines
of the Wadati-Benioff zone, inferred from Cahill and Isacks (1992). Topography
and unaccessibility prohibited the continuation of the profile further into the
Eastern Cordillera; in addition the sharp rise of the Western Cordillera
Escarpment led to a, although minimal, gap in the profile. Distortion effects
and deviations from two-dimensionality are low for most stations with the
particular exception of sites PAT and OBS (near Patacamaya geomagnetic observatory), where
the Coniri fault connects with the Laurani fault, and the forearc sites in

Fig. 1: Shaded relief map of the western central Andes (based on SRTM-90m data) showing locations of recently measured MT sites in the Bolivian Orocline. The profile line is a great circle projection of the sites, while dotted lines mark the depth to the Wadati-Benioff zone after Cahill and Isacks (1992).
PRELIMINARY 2-D
MODELING AND FIRST INTERPRETATION ATTEMPTS
It is a lucky and not often
encountered circumstance that induction vectors, derived from purely magnetic
transfer functions (the ratio of vertical to horizontal field variations Bz/Bh),
point in the direction of the profile over much of the study area (again with
exception of North Chile), permitting a 2-D interpretation of the data set at
least over the whole Altiplano. This direction is also corroborated by a
multi-site, multi-frequency strike analysis of MT transfer functions, employing
a code by McNeice and Jones (2001). A 2-D inversion code (Rodi and Mackie 2001)
was applied using a homogeneous halfspace as a starting model, incorporating
also the well conducting Pacific Ocean as a-priori structure. The data inverted
for were the magnetic transfer functions with addition of magnetotelluric
responses sensu strictu (apparent resistivities and phases). By adapting
respective error bounds the weight of phase data (reflecting the actual
induction process) was enhanced during inversion; effects due to static
distortion of apparent resistivity curves could thus be minimized. Numerous
inversion tests were performed, including variation of starting models,
inversion of TE, TM mode and Bz data separately and jointly,
calculation of trade-off curves, sensitivity studies, etc.
The expectation
concerning conductive structures below the Altiplano was to find a similar HCZ
in the deeper crust as below the Ancorp profile at 21°S. The resulting model,
however, looks strikingly different (Fig. 2). Near the surface the

Fig. 2: Resistivity model from 2-D inversion. A - A' - A'': Corque and
minor basins, B: deep crustal magma chamber below W. Cordillera?, C:
imperpeable upper crustal block, D: Eastern Cordillera block (analog to Dorbath
et al. 1993, Dorbath and Granet 1996), E: mantle wedge, F: rise of
fluids/melts. Question marks refer to areas of low resolution and/or
three-dimensionality. Data in the forearc were not taken into account.
The most spectacular feature of the
model is a very good conductor in the upper mantle below the Altiplano at
depths of approx. 120 km. From there a slightly less conductive structure is
observed, rising to middle crust. A similar, but oblique and even less
conductive branch reaches and underlies the western margin of the volcanic arc.
A resistive block is modelled in the upper crust; also the margins of the model
are resistive (i.e., below the forearc and the Eastern Cordillera), but
naturally these resistivities are not well resolved due to lacking data
coverage.
Although one might expect to image
the mantle wedge as a good conductor, several of its features are surprising:
a) Conductivities are so high (in
the order of 1 S/m) that a melt rate of at least 5% is needed. This contradicts
many assumptions based, e.g., on seismological studies. Perhaps more saline
fluids (usually thought to be more conductive then partial melt itself) then
previously thought are involved.
b) The shape resembles a dyke-like
structure; this is, however, not well resolved and other geometries are
possible, leaving the general characteristics concerning depth and position
untouched.
c) The position of the conductor (in
course agreement with a low-velocity zone detected by Dorbath and Granet 1996)
well to the east of the volcanic arc is not in accordance with standard
subduction scenarios. It must be taken into account, however, that we observe a
momentary image only and that volcanism in this particular study area has
recently been much less active then elsewhere in the Andes. One may speculate
that we observe the initiazation of a new magmatic event or the feeding of a
deep crustal magma reservoir similar to the one detected below the southern
Altiplano.
The Bolivian part of this study was carried out during my stay as guest lecturer at the Universidad Mayor de San Andrés (UMSA), La Paz, funded by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). The help of F. Ticona and D. Eydam made the field campaigns a success. I thank E. Ricaldi (UMSA), H. Wilke (Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta) and the German Embassy La Paz for logistical support, and the National Park authorities of Bolivia and Chile for the permit to work in Sajama and Lauca National Parks, respectively.
Brasse, H., Lezaeta, P., Rath, V.,
Schwalenberg, K., Soyer, W., and Haak, V. (2002): The Bolivian Altiplano
conductivity anomaly, J. Geophys. Res.,
107 (B5), 10.1029/ 2001JB000391.
Cahill, T.A. and Isacks, B.L. (1992):
Seismicity and the shape of the subducted Nazca Plate, J. Geophys. Res., 97
(B12),
17503-17529.
Dorbath, C., Granet, M., Poupinet, G., and
Dorbath, C. and Granet, M. (1996): Local earthquake
tomography of the Altiplano and the Eastern Cordillera of northern Bolivia, Tectonophysics, 259, 117-136.
Hérail, G., Rochat, P., Baby, P., Aranibar, O.,
Lavenu, A., and Mascle, G. (1997): El Altiplano Norte de Bolivia, evolución
geológica terciaria. In: R. Charrier, P. Aceituno, M. Castro, A. Llanos and
L.A. Raggi (Eds.), El Altiplano: ciencia y conciencia en los Andes, Actas 2. Simposio Internacional Estudios Altiplánicos,
Arica 1993. Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile, pp. 33-44.
McNeice, G.W. & Jones, A.G. (2001):
Multi-site, multi-frequency tensor decomposition of magnetotelluric data, Geophysics, 66, 158-173.
Ritz, M., Bondoux,
F., Hérail, G. and Sempere, T. (1991): A magnetotelluric survey in the northern Bolivian Altiplano, Geophys. Res. Lett., 18, 475-478.
Rodi, W. and Mackie, R.L. (2001): Nonlinear
conjugate gradients algorithm for 2-D magnetotelluric inversions, Geophysics, 66, 174-187.