________________________________________________________________ VOLUME 2, ISSUE 2 THE INTERPSYCH NEWSLETTER NOV, 1994 ________________________________________________________________ SECTION A: NEWS ********* * INDEX * ********* 1. SUICIDE COUNSELING BY E-MAIL 2. MULTIPLE PERSONALITY DISORDER ELECTRONIC CONFERENCE REPORT ************************************************************** 1. SUICIDE COUNSELING BY E-MAIL ************************************************************** When the power and reach of the Internet joins with the caring and compassion of a friend, a new and valuable asset is created.Suicide Counseling by E-mail was launched on July 14, 1994 and proved so successful that an Internet domain was opened. The Samaritans, a non-religious charity in Cheltenham, England, now offers emotional support to the suicidal and despairing via the Internet. At the launch of their new Internet domain, Mike Haines, Director of the Samaritans, said: "During the test month we received over 200 messages. Many were from well- wishers,journalists and academics but there were around 15 very desperate people as well. The need for a full launch of our service with an easier address was amply demonstrated." In the first 2 months of operation, 48 people in at least 4 countries have contacted the Samaritans, demonstrating the need for the service. Since then, the number of E-mail users has increased to 3 per day and the numbers continue increasing as the resource becomes better known. E-mail's anonymity has helped in the success of the pilot project. Statistically, the suicide rate among males is four times that of females but females are more likely to contact a Suicide Counseling group for help. E-mail has changed the contact statistics and it appears that equal numbers of men and women are contacting the Samaritans. The Samaritans have offered support to the suicidal and despairing for over 40 years by phone, visit and letter and E-mail expands their services to a wider area. Callers are guaranteed confidentiality and retain the right to make their own decisions including the decision to end their life. Samaritans are unpaid Volunteers who are carefully selected and trained for this work. Those working with E-mail have additional training and volunteers read and reply to mail every day of the year. A nominal end date of December 31, 1994 had been set for the E-mail service but initial results have been so encouraging that it is likely to run indefinitely. The idea for an Internet service was born when a volunteer was exploring the UK - based Compulink Information Exchange (CIX)conferencing service. Here, he discovered the "suicide help" self-help group and Newsnet groups such as "alt.support.depression".After discussions with The Samaritans General Office, it was decided to try the E-Mail service from Cheltenham. US Robotics assisted the project by donation of a modem and the staff at CIX assisted in the creation of the Internet domain. Is working over the Net good "treatment"? Steve 305 at the Samaritans' help-line says: "What we see is raw emotion and openness from our callers. Some of them would be unable to express their feelings in any other way. It also provides access and privacy for the disabled and geographically isolated. Our confidentiality rules prevent me from quoting what callers have written to us but it would be very familiar to people in the Usenet groups alt.suicide.holiday, alt.sexual.abuse.recovery,etc." The Samaritans can be reached at: The Samaritans of Cheltenham and District 3 Clarence Road CHELTENHA, Glos, United Kingdom Emergency phone: +44 242 515777 Press enquiries: +44 452 854017 E-mail: jo@samaritans.org Anonymous E-mail: samaritans@anon.penet.fi (SK) *************************************************************** 2. MULTIPLE PERSONALITY DISORDER ELECTRONIC CONFERENCE REPORT *************************************************************** On Sunday, October 30, 1994 at 12 PM EST, a conference on Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD), organized by Dr. Ivan Goldberg (psydoc@netcom.com) was held. During the approximately two hours the conference lasted, 17 participants enjoyed a lively discourse in an informal atmosphere that elucidated some of major concerns around the diagnosis of MPD. This issue is currently hot as news media and professionals are identifying and publicizing it more. It is surrounded by controversy both in the courts and in clinical circles. Is it a true diagnostic category? Is there a successful treatment intervention? These were some of the questions participants were interested in answering. A brief summary follows: Dr. Goldberg provoked a substantive exchange of ideas by sending his own paper on the subject, and a recommendation of readings prior to the conference (Multiple Personality Disorder, Paul R. McHugh, unpublished paper) and (August, Piper, Jr. Multiple Personality Disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1994, 164, 600-612.) Both of these papers can be obtained through Dr. Goldberg. It was apparent, that the main issue to be addressed was the viability of the diagnosis MPD. The issue of its ubiquitous symptom picture, its sensitivity to iatrogenic influence, and its relationship to other syndromes and diagnostic entities were debated. Iatrogenic is defined as, Induced unintentionally by a physician through his diagnosis, manner, or treatment; of or pertaining to the induction of (mental or bodily) disorders, symptoms, etc., in this way. (OED). Several cases were presented by conferees currently working with MPD patients or with some prior experience with them. One of the first lines of discussion dealt with current DSM III-R and DSM IV terminology, particularly the inclusion of an amnesia criterion. The DSM IV categorizes MPD under Dissociative Identity Disorder. This quickly led to an exploration of the use of "dissociative units" in some hospitals, and the possible influence of MPD patients on each other in their experience and reporting of symptoms. An interesting discussion of the "alt.support.dissociative" newsgroup ensued. The potential for self-reinforcement of multiple personalities as well as the benefits of "support" was pointed out. It was suggested that the "simulations" and "histrionic" expressions of MPD might prove to be helpful in determining that MPD is a unique disorder. The point was made that the public (and some clinicians) often does not discriminate between people who falsely believe they have multiple personalities and people who "actually (have) a multitude of personalities that do exist within them." Moreover, there is an inherent difficulty in empirically demonstrating such a difference. Patients who are diagnosed as such may be merely displaying a unique facility for partitioning experience, a kind of self-hypnosis. The discussion quickly moved to clinical interventions and strategies with everyone agreeing that respect for the experience of the patient while at the same time focusing on the "whole" of unified personality was the preferred overall treatment approach. However, specific treatment modalities were not discussed. Dr. Goldberg, cogently summarized by asking, "Am I correct in thinking that we all agree that DID/MPD is a dissociative disorder that may arise without iatrogenesis but that iatrogenesis is relatively common too?* This received unanimous endorsement. The success of these conferences clearly depends on participants being able to voice questions and comments without stepping on one another while at the same time focusing on one issue at a time. Dr. Goldberg, a veteran "e-conferencer", facilitated such an exchange of thoughts and ideas. (JL)